Regular physical activity can act as a healthy coping mechanism when dealing with cravings or anxiety related to your efforts towards alcohol moderation management. Lastly, this being a study, it is very possible that participants were better motivated, more informed, and more likely to put in the effort required to use the moderatedrinking.org program. Future work would need to assess the effectiveness of this tool what type of drug is mary jane in the field without such interference. The idea of giving up drinking completely is intimidating or discouraging for some people.

Sample

Abstinence may not be a realistic solution with some addictions, such as eating and in some cases sexual addictions. Alcohol moderation programs are endorsed as an effective option by organizations like the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). The Sinclair Method (TSM), which involves taking the drug naltrexone to relearn moderation, has a success rate of 78%. The general definition of moderate drinking is up to one drink per day for women and up to two daily drinks for men. Take our short alcohol quiz to learn where you fall on the drinking spectrum and if you might benefit from quitting or cutting back on alcohol. The negative effects of your drinking may have turned you off of alcohol entirely, and that’s completely okay.

What Are the Different Types of Drugs?

Abstinence from alcohol and other drugs has historically been a core criterion for recovery, defined by the Betty Ford Institute as a “voluntarily maintained lifestyle characterized by sobriety, personal health, and citizenship” (Betty Ford Institute Consensus Panel, 2007, p. 222). As recovery processes stretch over a long period, it is suggested that stable recovery is obtained after five years at the earliest (Hibbert and Best, 2011). The results suggest the importance of offering interventions with various treatment goals and that clients are all toads poisonous choosing CD as part of their sustained recovery would benefit from support in this process, both from peers and professionals.

What are Some Benefits of Moderation vs. Abstinence?

“Harm reduction” strategies, on theother hand, set more flexible goals in line with patient motivation; these differ greatlyfrom person to person, and range from total abstinence to reduced consumption and reducedalcohol-related problems without changes in actual use (e.g., no longer driving drunkafter having received a DUI). In the broadest sense, harm reduction seeks to reduceproblems related to drinking behaviors and supports any step in the right directionwithout requiring abstinence (Marlatt and Witkiewitz2010). Witkiewitz (2013) has suggestedthat abstinence may be less important than psychiatric, family, social, economic, andhealth outcomes, and that non-consumption measures like psychosocial functioning andquality of life should be goals for AUD research (Witkiewitz 2013).

After transcribing the interviews, the material was analysed thematically (Braun and Clarke, 2006) by coding the interview passages according to what was brought up both manually and by using NVivo (a software package for qualitative data analysis). After relistening to the interviews and scrutinizing transcripts, the material was categorized and summarized by picking relevant parts from each transcript. By iteratively analysing and compiling these in an increasingly condensed form, themes were created at an aggregated level, following a process of going back and forth between transcripts and the emerging themes as described by Braun and Clarke (op. cit.). In the present article, descriptions of abstinence and CD and views on and use of the AA and the 12-step programme were analysed.

At the first interview all IPs were abstinent and had a positive view on the 12-step treatment, although a few described a cherry-picking attitude. As the IP had a successful outcome, six months after treatment, their possibilities for CD might be better than for persons with SUD in general. On the other hand, as the group expressed positive views on this specific treatment, they might question the sobriety goal in a lesser extent than other groups. In the results, we mention that there were a few IPs that were younger, with a background of diffuse and complex problems characterized by a multi-problem situation. Research on young adults, including people in their thirties (Magaraggia and Benasso, 2019), stresses that young adults leaving care tend to have complex problems and struggle with problems such as poor health, poor school performance and crime (Courtney and Dworsky, 2006; Berlin et al., 2011; Vinnerljung and Sallnäs, 2008). Thus, this is interesting to analyse further although the younger IPs in this article, with experience of 12-step treatment, are too few to allow for a separate analysis.

If you have health problems related to alcohol, it may be unsafe to drink at all, period. By quitting drinking completely, your body can begin to repair the damage caused by alcohol. Family involvement plays an important role too since their understanding and encouragement can fuel your determination even more on challenging days. Remember that the path towards lasting recovery isn’t linear — there will be ups and downs. But with patience, persistence and these strategies at hand – you’re better equipped than ever before on this journey towards healthier living minus harmful drinking habits. A key aspect of abstinence is understanding and navigating through the withdrawal process – a daunting task indeed but necessary for recovery.

1. People who have a more severe drinking problem and find moderation difficult to maintain often do better with abstinence.
2. Thus, this is interesting to analyse further although the younger IPs in this article, with experience of 12-step treatment, are too few to allow for a separate analysis.
3. Finney and Moos (1991) reported a 17 percent “social or moderate drinking” rate at 6 years and a 24 percent rate at 10 years.
4. Quitting alcohol for good is a life-changing decision with countless benefits that will make you wonder why you didn’t quit sooner.
5. By quitting drinking completely, your body can begin to repair the damage caused by alcohol.

In 1990, Marlatt was introduced to the philosophy of harm reduction during a trip to the Netherlands (Marlatt, 1998). He adopted the language and framework of harm reduction in his own research, and in 1998 published a seminal book on harm reduction strategies for a range of substances and behaviors (Marlatt, 1998). Marlatt’s work inspired the development of multiple nonabstinence treatment models, including harm reduction psychotherapy (Blume, 2012; Denning, 2000; Tatarsky, 2002). Additionally, while early studies of SUD treatment used abstinence as the single measure of treatment effectiveness, by the late 1980s and early 1990s researchers were increasingly incorporating psychosocial, health, and quality of life measures (Miller, 1994).

An additional concern is that the lack of research supporting the efficacy of established interventions for achieving nonabstinence goals presents a barrier to implementation. The current review highlights a notable gap in research empirically evaluating the effectiveness of nonabstinence approaches for DUD treatment. While multiple harm reduction-focused treatments for AUD have strong empirical support, there is very little research testing models of nonabstinence treatment for drug use. Despite compatibility with harm reduction in established SUD treatment models such as MI and RP, there is a dearth of evidence testing these as standalone treatments for helping patients achieve nonabstinence goals; this is especially true regarding DUD (vs. AUD).

Additionally, the survey asked about current quality oflife using a 4-point scale as administered by the World Health Organization (The WHOQOL Group 1998). Our second goal was to examine differences in quality of life betweenabstainers and non-abstainers controlling for length of time in recovery. Given the abstinence focus of many SUD treatment centers, studies may need to recruit using community outreach, which can yield fewer participants compared to recruiting from treatment (Jaffee et al., 2009).

Besides, alcohol affects your sleep quality and mental health too; it’s not uncommon for people who drink regularly to struggle with anxiety or depression. In Britain and other European and Commonwealth countries, controlled-drinking therapy is widely available (Rosenberg et al., 1992). The following six questions explore the value, prevalence, and clinical impact of controlled drinking vs. abstinence outcomes in alcoholism treatment; they are intended to argue the case for controlled drinking as a reasonable and realistic goal. Studies have shown that in some cultures there are a small percentage of people who can return to moderate drinking. Attempts at moderation may not be worth the effort or the risk when considering the consequences.

You may feel pressured by society’s view of what is acceptable drinking behaviour or fear being ostracised due to cultural norms surrounding alcohol use. Psychologically, you might be dealing with a range of emotions from guilt over past incidents to anxiety about future relapses. Also, consider your health – excessive drinking can lead to serious conditions like liver disease or heart problems. While you may see the appeal in a programme that allows for some level of drink intake, it’s crucial to consider the potential drawbacks that could come with this approach. Even moderate drinking can lead to long-term health problems such as liver disease, heart disease, and increased risk of certain cancers.

Advocates of nonabstinence approaches often point to indirect evidence, including research examining reasons people with SUD do and do not enter treatment. This literature – most of which has been conducted in the U.S. – suggests a strong link between abstinence goals and treatment entry. For example, in one study testing the predictive validity of a measure of treatment readiness among non-treatment-seeking people who use drugs, the authors can alcoholics have food cooked with alcohol found that the only item in their measure that significantly predicted future treatment entry was motivation to quit using (Neff & Zule, 2002). The study was especially notable because most other treatment readiness measures have been validated on treatment-seeking samples (see Freyer et al., 2004). This finding supplements the numerous studies that identify lack of readiness for abstinence as the top reason for non-engagement in SUD treatment, even among those who recognize a need for treatment (e.g., Chen, Strain, Crum, & Mojtabai, 2013; SAMHSA, 2019a). Multiple theories of motivation for behavior change support the importance of self-selection of goals in SUD treatment (Sobell et al., 1992).

When they try to quit and fail, they may give up on making a change, feeling ashamed and hopeless. Moderation is a more achievable alternative that allows you to drink occasionally while still enjoying a healthier life. It means you can enjoy an occasional drink while still reducing negative drinking behaviors, hangovers, and the risk of alcohol-related health issues.

Still, if you want the easiest way to minimize the problems in your life, go for abstinence eventually. It actually is much easier to just give it up entirely than punish yourself trying to moderate or control your addictive behavior. Studies have shown that regardless of the method employed to become sober, the number one factor for sobriety success is a permanent commitment to discontinue use permanently; a commitment to abstinence. Administrative discharge due to substance use is not a necessary practice even within abstinence-focused treatment (Futterman, Lorente, & Silverman, 2004), and is likely linked to the assumption that continued use indicates lack of readiness for treatment, and that abstinence is the sole marker of treatment success.

Thus, studies will need to emphasize measures of substance-related problems in addition to reporting the degree of substance use (e.g., frequency, quantity). Unfortunately, there has been little empirical research evaluating this approach among individuals with DUD; evidence of effectiveness comes primarily from observational research. For example, at a large outpatient SUD treatment center in Amsterdam, goal-aligned treatment for drug and alcohol use involves a version of harm reduction psychotherapy that integrates MI and CBT approaches, and focuses on motivational enhancement, self-control training, and relapse prevention (Schippers & Nelissen, 2006). Participants with controlled use goals in this center are typically able to achieve less problematic (38%) or non-problematic (32%) use, while a minority achieve abstinence with (8%) or without (6%) incidental relapse (outcomes were not separately assessed for those with AUD vs. DUD; Schippers & Nelissen, 2006). Multiple versions of harm reduction psychotherapy for alcohol and drug use have been described in detail but not yet studied empirically.

Clients were recruited via treatment units (outpatient and inpatient) in seven Swedish city areas. Inclusion criteria were drawn up to recruit interviewees able to reflect on their process of change. Therefore, the client should be at the end of or have recently completed post-treatment intervention and be judged by a professional to be in a positive change process regarding their SUD. In the initial interviews, all the clients declared themselves abstinent and stressed that substance use in any form was not an option. It’s heartbreaking to see loved ones caught in the grip of addiction, but there’s hope – research shows that many people find success with programmes aimed at reducing consumption.

How Successful Are Controlled Drinking Programmes?

Polich, Armor, and Braiker found that the most severely dependent alcoholics (11 or more dependence symptoms on admission) were the least likely to achieve nonproblem drinking at 4 years. However, a quarter or this group who achieved remission did so through nonproblem drinking. Furthermore, younger (under 40), single alcoholics were far more likely to relapse if they were abstinent at 18 months than if they were drinking without problems, even if they were highly alcohol-dependent. Thus the Rand study found a strong link between severity and outcome, but a far from ironclad one.

Recognise patterns of thought that lead to excessive drinking like stress, boredom or loneliness; addressing these underlying issues is often a key part of cutting down or cutting out alcohol. Rather, when people with SUD are surveyed about reasons they are not in treatment, not being ready to stop using substances is consistently the top reason cited, even among individuals who perceive a need for treatment (SAMHSA, 2018, 2019a). Indeed, about 95% of people with SUD say they do not need SUD treatment (SAMHSA, 2019a). Even among those who do perceive a need for treatment, less than half (40%) make any effort to get it (SAMHSA, 2019a). Although reducing practical barriers to treatment is essential, evidence suggests that these barriers do not fully account for low rates of treatment utilization. Instead, the literature indicates that most people with SUD do not want or need – or are not ready for – what the current treatment system is offering.

Sample

Alcohol moderation management programmes are often successful when tailored to an individual’s specific needs and circumstances. The effectiveness of these programmes can greatly vary depending on several factors such how to wean someone off alcohol as treatment duration, individual factors, and programme challenges. It is very important to note that this study specifically excluded people who had previously been admitted to alcohol or drug treatment as well as those who had symptoms of severe alcohol withdrawal at any point in their life (like delirium tremens and such). This means that the participants likely did not include some of the most severe alcoholic cases. Following that logic, it makes a lot of sense to me to include the idea of moderation as another option in the addiction treatment arsenal.

Controlled drinkers

Only a small minority of people with substance use disorders (SUDs) receive treatment. A focus on abstinence is pervasive in SUD treatment, defining success in both research and practice, and punitive measures are often imposed on those who do not abstain. Most adults with SUD do not seek treatment because they do not wish to stop using substances, though many also recognize a need for help.

Individuals with greater SUD severity tend to be most receptive to therapist input about goal selection (Sobell, Sobell, Bogardis, Leo, & Skinner, 1992). This suggests that treatment experiences and therapist input can influence participant goals over time, and there is value in engaging patients with non-abstinence goals in treatment. In the 1980s and 1990s, the HIV/AIDS epidemic prompted recognition of the role of drug use in disease transmission, generating new urgency around the adoption of a public health-focused approach to researching and treating drug use problems (Sobell & Sobell, 1995). The realization that HIV had been spreading widely among people who injected drugs in the mid-1980s led to the first syringe services programs (SSPs) in the U.S. (Des Jarlais, 2017). Early attempts to establish pilot SSPs were met with public outcry and were blocked by politicians (Anderson, 1991).

As a newer iteration of RP, Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention (MBRP) has a less extensive research base, though it has been tested in samples with a range of SUDs (e.g., Bowen et al., 2009; Bowen et al., 2014; Witkiewitz et al., 2014). Our team at CATCH strongly believes in holistic healing methods as part of this process. Therefore, our programme includes evidence-based therapies such as cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) or dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT). This multifaceted approach helps you develop coping mechanisms while fostering healthier habits that can sustain long-term recovery.

1. Even moderate drinking can lead to long-term health problems such as liver disease, heart disease, and increased risk of certain cancers.
2. It is important to highlight that most of the studies cited above did not provide goal-matched treatment; thus, these outcomes generally reflect differences between individuals with abstinence vs. non-abstinence goals who participated in abstinence-based AUD treatment.
3. While AUD treatment studies commonly rely on guidelines set by government agencies regarding a “low-risk” or “nonhazardous” level of alcohol consumption (e.g., Enggasser et al., 2015), no such guidelines exist for illicit drug use.
4. In fact, for those who have found total abstinence too difficult, moderation management can be a life-saver—giving them an achievable way to limit alcohol’s negative impacts.

Models of nonabstinence psychosocial treatment for SUD

Thus relying on DSM criteria to define a sample of individuals in recovery mayunintentionally exclude individuals who are engaging in non-abstinent or harm reductiontechniques and making positive changes in their lives. In parallel with the view on abstinence as a core criterion for recovery, controlled drinking (CD) has been a recurring concept and in focus from time to time in research on alcohol problems for more than half a century (Davies, 1962; Roizen, 1987; Saladin and Santa Ana, 2004). It caused heated debates, and for a long time, it has had a rather limited impact on professional treatment systems (Coldwell and Heather, 2006). Recently, in many European countries (Klingemann and Rosenberg, 2009; Klingemann, 2016; Davis et al., 2017) and in the USA (Coldwell, 2005; Davis and Rosenberg, 2013), professionals working with clients with severe problems and clients in inpatient care tend to have abstinence as a treatment goal . However, CD is a widely accepted treatment goal in Australia, Britain and Norway (Luquines et al., 2011). The Swedish treatment system has been dominated by total abstinence as the goal, although treatment with CD as a goal exists (e.g., Agerberg, 2014; Berglund et al., 2019).

His work has been published in leading professional journals and popular publications around the globe. Such was its popularity that SMART Recovery grew from 42 group meetings at the beginning to more than 2000 in North America alone today and now proliferating worldwide in 23 countries and counting. Some interview person (IP) were former polydrug users and alcohol dry eyes altered between AA and NA meetings. Thus, the results may be more relevant for women with similar experiences as the investigated sample. The number of drinks consumed per day alone is not a sufficient criterion to use when trying to diagnose someone with an Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD). Alcoholism is a complex issue characterised by a range of behavioural, physical, and psychological factors.

In contrast to the holistic approach of harm reduction psychotherapy, risk reduction interventions are generally designed to target specific HIV risk behaviors (e.g., injection or sexual risk behaviors) without directly addressing mechanisms of SUD, and thus are quite limited in scope. However, these interventions also typically lack an abstinence focus and sometimes result in reductions in drug use. Harm reduction may also be well-suited for people with high-risk drug use and severe, treatment-resistant SUDs (Finney & Moos, 2006; Ivsins, Pauly, Brown, & Evans, 2019).

Previous reviews have described nonabstinence pharmacological approaches (e.g., Connery, 2015; Palpacuer et al., 2018), which are outside the scope of the current review. We first describe treatment models with an explicit harm reduction or nonabstinence focus. While there are multiple such intervention approaches for treating AUD with strong empirical support, we highlight a dearth of research testing models of harm reduction treatment for DUD. Next, we review other established SUD treatment models that are compatible with non-abstinence goals. We focus our how to stop drinking out of boredom review on two well-studied approaches that were initially conceptualized – and have been frequently discussed in the empirical literature – as client-centered alternatives to abstinence-based treatment.

Multivariable stepwise regressions (Table2) show that younger individuals were significantly more likely to benon-abstinent, and movement to the next oldest age category reduced the odds ofnon-abstinence by an average of 27%. Importantly, the confidence intervals were narrow andextremely similar across models, implying that the effect of age was robust to modelspecification. In regard to help-seeking and problem severity, having attended at leastone 12-step meeting and the number of DSM-IV dependence symptoms were both significantlyrelated to non-abstinence. In the fully saturated models, any twelve-step attendancedecreased odds of non-abstinence by 57–76% (Model 4), while each additional DSMsymptom decreased odds of non-abstinence by 73–89% (Model 4).

Some rappers have partnered with organizations and launched campaigns to support addiction recovery. Through concerts, public service announcements, and social media engagement, they aim to destigmatize addiction and provide resources for those in need. These rappers’ stories highlight the importance of seeking help, finding support networks, and making the commitment to change. They serve as role models for individuals facing similar challenges, proving that recovery is a possibility. Support systems can include initiatives such as counseling services, addiction recovery programs, and peer support groups. These resources can help rappers navigate the challenges of addiction and provide them with the necessary tools for recovery.

Choose Recovery Over Addiction

• Positive change and support within the rap community are crucial in combating drug addiction.
• These initiatives play a crucial role in raising awareness, reducing stigma, and encouraging individuals to seek help.
• Support systems can include initiatives such as counseling services, addiction recovery programs, and peer support groups.
• When paired with the support of drug and alcohol recovery centers, your chance for a long-term recovery is high, and your future is bright!
• While some superstars are able to overcome addiction and clean up their acts quietly and swiftly, it takes drug addict rappers and other performers years of struggle.

But he’s not the first rapper to fall victim to addiction, and thankfully, he’s still alive. I can’t speak to what anyone else needs, but for me, it was going to inpatient treatment and 12-step meetings. Part of the 12-step literature states that we’re supposed to be anonymous.

Expand music menu

When Harris was San Francisco’s district attorney, she supported the legal use of medical marijuana but opposed a 2010 measure to legalize pot in California, according to the Los Angeles Times. During her tenure, she oversaw the conviction of more than 1,900 people for weed violations, The Mercury News reported. Prosecutors on her staff convicted people on these charges at a rate higher than under her predecessor, however, most of the defendants were not rappers with addictions incarcerated for low-level pot possession, according to the outlet. This would change marijuana from a Schedule I to Schedule III drug under the Controlled Substances Act, marking the biggest shift in marijuana policy the federal government has made since pot was first outlawed. In 2022, Biden directed the Department of Health and Human Services to review how marijuana is classified and subsequently recommended it be reclassified as a less dangerous drug.

How can fans support rappers who are struggling with drug addiction?

Currently the overdose is unconfirmed, but DMX has struggled with addiction throughout much of his life, spending time in rehab and suffering legal consequences due to possession of drugs. Support and rehabilitation are vital components of the recovery process for rappers with drug addiction. It is essential to surround oneself with a strong support system, which may include family, friends, therapists, and fellow recovering individuals. This support helps individuals stay motivated, provides accountability, and offers guidance during challenging times. The iconic rapper has been open about his battle with addiction to prescription drugs, particularly opioids like Vicodin and Valium. He has spoken candidly about his journey to sobriety and the impact of addiction on his life and career.

How To Tell If You Need Medical Alcohol Detox

When the pandemic hit and we were all in lockdown, I finally got to press pause. I’d been waiting my whole life to have this period where I’m just at home and I get to hang out with my kids and I can’t even do anything else if I wanted to. Then I’m on these Zoom meetings but I’m on Instagram while I’m listening. I tapped out of my recovery community, and then I relapsed in July.

• You can click on the acid rappers’ names to see more information about that particular notable acid rap group.
• “I was like, ‘Man, we’re doing too much—way too much.” He is also a vegetarian.
• By sharing their struggles and triumphs, these rappers not only break the stigma surrounding addiction but also inspire others to seek help and make positive changes in their lives.
• The partnership comes at a time when alcohol use is rising and overdose deaths are at an all-time high.
• Eminem’s journey to sobriety is a testament to his resilience and serves as an inspiration for others facing similar challenges.

Sober Rappers Who Don’t Drink or Do Drugs

• Eminem’s battle with addiction is documented in some of the rapper’s albums.
• Lil Wayne has been open about his use of lean, a concoction containing codeine.
• By promoting mental health awareness, encouraging positive change, and providing accessible treatment options, the industry can strive towards a healthier and more supportive environment for artists.
• In June 2022, he violated a protective order filed against him by his ex-girlfriend and was subsequently sent to jail.

• Mental health issues often underlie substance abuse, and it is essential to recognize and address these underlying factors.
• There’s this false notion that musicians are at their best when they are using a ton of drugs — that’s how they channel the spirit.